THE COMPARATIVE INTERPRETOLOGY AS A COGNITIVE DISCOURSE OF MODERN PIANO PRACTICE

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-Cilt 6 Sayı 24
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 510-515
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of the comparative interpretology in the aspect of the systematic presentation of the results of scientific cognition by the performer of his/her professional activity. The method of the comparative analysis is widely represented in the modern process of scientific understanding and constitutes the prospect of studying the theoretical problems of interpretology. The structure of the comparative analysis reflects the hierarchy of musical performance as the art of interpretation: from a composer's text and a musical composition as an object of performing interpretation to performing text and performing dramaturgy, on the basis of which the idea of a performing style is born. This hierarchy proves that for the performer the comparative analysis is a method, direction and mechanism for researching artefacts of piano art. As a consequence, the comparative method of analysing performing dramaturgy is not only the result of the interaction of several approaches, but also the final stage of the performing analysis of a musical composition. The developed method of the comparative analysis from the point of view of the performer as a subject of scientific activity is aimed at a stage-by-stage comprehension and scientific description of the fundamental differences in the performing dramaturgy of the same composition in different performing versions of outstanding pianists. Comparing them from the point of view of the artistic result (artefact) makes it possible for the musician to come closer to uncovering the secrets of the composer's creativity and to develop his/her own performing interpretation of the selected composition.

Keywords

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of the comparative interpretology in the aspect of the systematic presentation of the results of scientific cognition by the performer of his/her professional activity. The method of the comparative analysis is widely represented in the modern process of scientific understanding and constitutes the prospect of studying the theoretical problems of interpretology. The structure of the comparative analysis reflects the hierarchy of musical performance as the art of interpretation: from a composer's text and a musical composition as an object of performing interpretation to performing text and performing dramaturgy, on the basis of which the idea of a performing style is born. This hierarchy proves that for the performer the comparative analysis is a method, direction and mechanism for researching artefacts of piano art. As a consequence, the comparative method of analysing performing dramaturgy is not only the result of the interaction of several approaches, but also the final stage of the performing analysis of a musical composition. The developed method of the comparative analysis from the point of view of the performer as a subject of scientific activity is aimed at a stage-by-stage comprehension and scientific description of the fundamental differences in the performing dramaturgy of the same composition in different performing versions of outstanding pianists. Comparing them from the point of view of the artistic result (artefact) makes it possible for the musician to come closer to uncovering the secrets of the composer's creativity and to develop his/her own performing interpretation of the selected composition.

Keywords


  • Cherednichenko T.V. (1989). Tendencies in contemporary Western music aesthetics. To the analysis of the

  • Cherednichenko T.V. (1989). Tendencies in contemporary Western music aesthetics. To the analysis of the methodological paradoxes of the science of music. Moscow.

  • Gurenko E.G. (1982). Problems of artistic interpretation (philosophical analysis). Novosibirsk.

  • Korykhalova N. (1979). Interpretation of music: Theoretical problems of music performance and a critical analysis of their development in contemporary bourgeois aesthetics.

  • Lieberman E.Y. (1988). Creative work of the pianist with the author's text. Moscow, Music.

  • Markova O.M. (2002). Problems of the theory of performance: materials for the course of the theory of performance for masters and graduate students. Odesa.

  • Medushevsky V.V. (1994). Ontological foundations of music interpretation. Interpretation of a piece ofmusic in the context of culture: The collection of works at the Gnesins Russian Academy of Music, Issue. 129. Moscow.

  • Moskalenko V.G. (2013) Lectures on musical interpretations. Textbook. Kyiv.

  • Polusmyak I.M. (1989). Theoretical and methodological aspects of musicological interpretation: Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of a Candidate of Art Criticism. Kyiv.

  • Shapovalova L. (2017). Interpretology as an integrative science. Problems of interaction between art, pedagogy and theory and practice of education. Collection of scientific articles. Kharkiv.

  • Sheiko V.M., Bogutsky Y.P. (2005). Formation of the foundations of culturology in the time of civilizational globalization (the second half of the 19th – the beginning of the 21st century): Monograph. Kyiv.

  • Timofeyeva K.V. (2009). Comparative analysis as a method of interpretology (on the example of piano performance). Abstract of dissertation for the degree of a Candidate of Art Criticism. Kharkiv.

  • Vakhranev Y. (1994). Music performance (poetics). Kharkiv.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics