COVİD-19 UZAKTAN EĞİTİM SÜRECİNDE ÖĞRENCİLERİN EVDEKİ ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-Cilt 6 Sayı 23
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 354-372
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Covid-19 uzaktan eğitim sürecinde evlerinde farklı öğrenme araçları ile eğitimlerini sürdüren ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin evlerindeki öğrenme ortamlarının farklı değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesidir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemi ve tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların tespitinde seçkisiz olmayan örnekleme yöntemlerinden amaçlı örnekleme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verilerini toplamak için Araklı ilçe merkezindeki iki ortaokul ve iki lisede öğrenim gören 21 öğrenci ve 21 veliye, aynı okullarda öğretmenlik yapan 11 öğretmene 2020-2021 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde görüşme formu uygulanmıştır. Katılımcıların Covid-19 evden uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğrencilerin öğrenme ortamlarının değerlendirilmesine yönelik görüşlerin analizinde içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Görüşme formlarından elde edilen veriler kategorilere ayrılarak ve uygun kodlamalar yapılarak sunulmuştur. Eba TV ders takibi %17 düzeyinde ve canlı ders takibi olanağı olmayan öğrencilerin başvurduğu bir uygulamadır. Tüm öğrencilerin canlı derslere katılabilecek fiziki, teknolojik ve maddi yeterlilikte olmamaları uzaktan eğitimde fırsat eşitliğini ortadan kaldıran en önemli problemdir. Evden ders takip sürecinde öğrencilerin fiziksel olarak hazır olmamaları, ev-oda-masa düzenlerinin ders işlenmesine uygun olmaması, akranlardan uzak kalınması sebebi ile sosyal ve psikolojik problemlerle karşılaşılması, aşırı teknolojik araçların kullanımından dolayı sosyal ve fiziki problemlerle karşılaşılması, çocuklarının evdeki eğitim kontrolünde sistematik uygulamalardan uzak kalan ailelerin süreci yönetmedeki sıkıntılarla karşılaşılması temel problemler arasında yer almaktadır. Uzaktan eğitimde fırsat eşitliğinin sağlanabilmesi için sağlık, sosyal ve psikolojik önlemlerin alındığı pandemik eğitim kurumlarının dezavantajlı öğrencilerin hizmetine sunulması faydalı olacaktır.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the learning environments at home of secondary and high school students who continue their education with different learning tools at home in the Covid-19 distance education process in terms of different variables. Qualitative research method and survey model were used in the research. Purposeful sampling technique, one of the non-random sampling methods, were used in determining the participants. In order to collect the research data, an interview form was applied to 21 students and 21 parents from two secondary schools and two high schools in Araklı district center, and to 11 teachers working at the same schools in the fall semester of the 2020-2021 academic year. In order to collect research data, interview forms were applied to 21 students and 21 parents from two secondary schools and two high schools in Araklı district center, and 11 teachers who were teaching at the same schools in the fall semester of the 2020-2021 academic year. Content analysis was used in the analysis of the participants 'views on the evaluation of students' learning environments in the Covid-19 distance education process. The data obtained from the interview forms were presented by categorizing them and making appropriate coding. Eba TV is an application that students who do not have the opportunity to follow the course and do not have the opportunity to follow live classes. The fact that all students are not physically, technologically and financially capable of attending live classes is the most important problem that eliminates the equality of opportunity in distance education. During the course follow-up from home, students are not physically ready for lessons, the home-room-table layout is not suitable for teaching, social and psychological problems due to being away from peers, social and physical problems arising from the use of excessive technological tools are important problems in distance education. In addition, the difficulties encountered in the management of the process of the families who stay away from systematic applications in the education control of their children at home are among the main problems. In order to ensure equality of opportunity in distance education, it will be beneficial to offer pandemic education institutions, where health, social and psychological measures are taken, to the service of disadvantaged students.

Keywords


  • Al Lily, A. E., Ismail, A. F., Abunasser, F. M., & Alqahtani, R. H. A. (2020). Distance education as a

  • Al Lily, A. E., Ismail, A. F., Abunasser, F. M., & Alqahtani, R. H. A. (2020). Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. Technology in society, 63, 101317.

  • Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal.

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Foundations of qualitative research in education. Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods, 1-48.

  • Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124.

  • Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education.

  • Büyükkaragöz, S.S. ve Çivi, C. (1999) Genel öğretim metodları; öğretimde planlama ve uygulama. Beta basım dağıtım A.Ş. İstanbul.

  • Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

  • Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91-96.

  • Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational studies in mathematics, 56(1), 39-65.

  • Devetak, I., Glažar, S. A., & Vogrinc, J. (2010). The role of qualitative research in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 77-84.

  • De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R. J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learningcommunities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35(3), 257- 286.

  • Dewey, J. (1986, September). Experience and education. In The educational forum (Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 241- 252). Taylor & Francis Group.

  • de Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T., & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, (29), 139-152.

  • Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465.

  • Erfidan, A. (2019). Derslerin uzaktan eğitim yoluyla verilmesiyle ilgili öğretim elemanı ve öğrenci görüşleri Balıkesir Üniversitesi örneği (Master's thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

  • Ertürk, A., & Cemaloğlu, N. (2014). Causes of mobbing behavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3669-3678.

  • Fantuzzo, J., McWayne, C., Perry, M. A., & Childs, S. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvementand their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School psychology review, 33(4), 467-480.

  • Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-18.

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607.

  • Hammami, A., Harrabi, B., Mohr, M., & Krustrup, P. (2020). Physical activity and coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19): specific recommendations for home-based physical training. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-6. Hopf, C. (2004). Qualitative interviews: An overview. A companion to qualitative research, 203(8).

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

  • Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

  • Kahraman, M. E. (2020). “COVID-19 Salgınının Uygulamalı Derslere Etkisi ve Bu Derslerin Uzaktan Eğitimle Yürütülmesi: Temel Tasarım Dersi Örneği”, Medeniyet Sanat Dergisi, 6, (1), ss. 44-56.

  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: Asystematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315.

  • Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. C. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distancelearning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(1), 40-60.

  • Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2017). Quality issues of online distance learning. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 685-691.

  • MEB, (2020-1). Erişim Adresi: Bakan Selçuk Uzaktan Eğitim Detaylarını Anlattı. http://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-23-martta-baslayacak-uzaktan-egitime-iliskin-detaylari-

  • anlatti/haber/20554/tr. (10.08.2020).

  • MEB, (2020-2). Erişim Adresi: http://www.meb.gov.tr/uzaktan-egitim-30-nisana-kadar-devam- edecek/haber/20585/tr. (10.09.2020).

  • Meeter, M., Bele, T., den Hartogh, C., Bakker, T., de Vries, R. E., & Plak, S. (2020). College students’ motivation and study results after COVID-19 stay-at-home orders.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised andExpanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Nitel veri analizi: Genişletilmiş bir kaynak kitap (Çev. Ed. S. Akbaba-Altun & A. Ersoy). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Molsbie, R.G. (1996). Science achievement as a criterion for judging the effectiveness of Home Schooling,Christian Schooling and Public Schooling. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; 1996; ProQuestpg. n/a.

  • Özmen, H., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2019). Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science.

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative research in Psychology, 2(4), 281-307.

  • Race, P. (2014). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory education. Sage.

  • Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88.

  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in nursing & health, 18(2), 179-183.

  • Shapovalova, T., Kubrikova, A., Pugatsky, M., & Petrova, G. (2020). Legal And Pedagogical Aspects OfStudents Adaptation To Distance Learning. In European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS (pp. 156-165).

  • Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2020). Qualitative research. Sage Publications Limited.

  • Somuah, B. A., Kariuki, S. I., & Itegi, F. M. (2019). Correlation between familial roles and persistence offemale students on distance education programmes in Ghana: Through the lens of an administrator. Open Praxis, 11(3), 261-273.

  • Susam, B., Demir, M. K., & Şahin, Ç. (2019). Evde eğitim uygulamasına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 163-171.

  • Thomas, R. J., Beatty, A. L., Beckie, T. M., Brewer, L. C., Brown, T. M., Forman, D. E., ... & Whooley, M.A. (2019). Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a scientific statement from the American Association ofCardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation, 140(1), e69-e89.

  • Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., Chitsaz, S., Karimian, L., & Charkhchi, R. (2011). A classification of qualitative research methods. Research Journal of International Studies, 20(20), 106-123.

  • TUBİTAK, (2021). Türkiye’de son durum. Erişim Adresi: http://covid19.tubitak.gov.tr/turkiyede-durum. (21.02.2021).

  • Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2017). Understanding students’ learning practices: challenges for design andintegration of mobile technology into distance education. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(3), 357-377.

  • Walter, É., & Pronzato, L. (1990). Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models—a survey. Automatica, 26(2), 195-213.

  • Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., & Jiang, F. (2020). Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet, 395(10228), 945-947.

  • White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Basil Blackwell.

  • Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency.

  • World Health Organization, (2021). WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Erişim Adresi: https://covid19.who.int/. (21.02.2021).

  • Yarovaya, O., Yarovaya, L., & Bogatskaya, E. (2020). Distance learning during coronavirus: problems and solutions. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 210, p. 18051). EDP Sciences.

  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics